Home
About Us
Our Position
Our History
What's New?
Links
Operator Education
Boater Education
Reports
Statistics

About us:

Since our formation in early 2000, the Coalition of Parents and Families for Personal Watercraft Safety has moved to bring attention to the need for increased caution while operating Personal Watercraft, the need for boater education by Personal Watercraft operators, as well as all other boaters, and the need for design changes to address the Human Factor in PWC operation.


Three focus areas were mentioned in our first mission statement:

  1. Increased safety through public awareness and education concerning the nature of Personal Watercraft as vehicles with significant horsepower and without off-throttle steering or braking capacity.

    In the first year we put up an estimated 500 posters around lakes in the North Texas, Central Texas and Southern Oklahoma area with the cooperation of law enforcement agencies. Posters are available upon request through our webmaster. This year?s theme is that 76% of all PWC accidents are collisions?70% with other vessels, and 6% with fixed objects. Posters have been successfully used as warning handbills by law enforcement personnel patrolling lake areas.
     

  2. Increased safety through legislation requiring certification of all Personal Watercraft Operators, and limits of youth operation to none below the age of 16.
    The Coalition continues to stress the importance of Boater Education. We have worked to pass boater education packages in two states this past year, Texas and Nevada. We were pleased to see the Nevada package pass, but unfortunately Texas, which frequently has the dubious position of first or second in boating accident fatalities in the nation, did not pass their mandatory boater education package. We were told that rental agencies raised a last-minute concern that mandatory education would interfere with their businesses. States which have passed mandatory packages, such as Florida, have not experienced any decline in rental businesses.

    A number of states have passed mandatory Boater Education acts, but we find frequently the admonition by the American Academy of Pediatrics that children under 16 should not operate PWC is ignored, and a qualifier is put in allowing children who have completed Boater Education classes to operate them. Some states allow children as young as 12 to operate PWC!  Imagine allowing your 12-year-old to drive a  car without brakes at 55 mph!
     

  3. Increased safety through timely manufacturer compliance with NTSB recommendations for adequate warning, labeling, padding, helmet use, and off-throttle steering and braking capacity development.

    Recent changes to PWC design reflect the Industry?s response to pressure from the NTSB and the Coast Guard to solve the problem of off-throttle steering loss. There is still no standard despite the NTSB report, which is now 4 years old. With respect to writing a standard for PWC collision avoidance, we would rather see the standard take more time, or have the Coast Guard proceed to rulemaking,  than to write a loose standard just for the sake of having one.

    The Coast Guard has re-opened the once-tabled question of helmets for Personal Watercraft Operators with the advent of new helmet technologies. Labels have been developed for newer models, which, in our opinion, are lengthy, and sometimes vague.  One criticism we have of the label is that it states ?keep hair away from intake grate?.   The Coalition is aware of at least two deaths that occurred when individuals fell from the back of a moving PWC and were sucked under to drown beneath the craft, caught by their hair. It is our opinion that long hair should be kept beneath a cap or helmet that will prevent accidental ingestion of hair into the intake. Although the mental picture of this scenario is gruesome, the warning needs to be more truthful than ?keep hair away.?  
     


Older models have not been recalled for re-labeling or for additional padding, nor do we know of any plans to retro-fit them with a fin or rudder to provide off-power or off-throttle steering. We would like to see some consideration of these possibilities, considering the number of older and used PWC.